Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMunoz L., Fernando
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:58.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:50:55Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2009-03-12T00:00:00-07:00
dc.identifierstudent_papers/85
dc.identifier.contextkey780801
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5694
dc.description.abstractConstitutional theory greatly benefits by the use of intellectual resources from disciplines such as political theory and philosophy of language. In this work, such elements are combined to elaborate on the agenda of constitutional theory and distinguish it from other projects. The emphasis is put on the possibility of understanding the constitution as a political grammar, providing its users –the participants of the politico-constitutional process broadly speaking– with syntactic rules and semantic signposts to formulate their ideas, projects, strategies. This view can account for the radical instability of constitutional meaning –in other words, disagreement– by pointing to the so-called separation of signifier and signified made prominent by contemporary philosophy, reinforced by the fact that the recursiveness and self-reference of written language makes the syntactic functions of the constitution open to the same instability that its semantic contents have. Regarding the constitution, just as any other text, we can proclaim the death of the author.
dc.titleA Political Reading of the Constitution
dc.source.journaltitleStudent Scholarship Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:50:55Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/student_papers/85
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1085&context=student_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
A_Political_Reading_Essay.pdf
Size:
120.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record