Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchaerer, Enrique
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:58.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:50:50Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2007-04-24T00:00:00-07:00
dc.identifierstudent_papers/42
dc.identifier.contextkey298308
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5664
dc.description.abstractA half-truth need not be a whole lie for insurance purposes; insurance law must distinguish between concealment and misrepresentation for equity and efficiency reasons. Reasonable disclosure should be the goal of underwriting, though what is “reasonable” should depend upon the insured’s degree of sophistication. This Comment argues that, whereas it may be equitable and efficient to relax the disclosure duty for the average person, it makes sense to raise this duty for the commercial insured. This argument is normative—asking what the duty ought to be, rather than what it is—though it finds empirical support in the case law.
dc.titleHalf-Truths, Whole Lies, & the Duty of Disclosure in Insurance Law
dc.source.journaltitleStudent Scholarship Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:50:50Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/student_papers/42
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=student_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Comment_4_23_07.pdf
Size:
97.78Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record