Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhipple, Sam
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:57.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:50:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:50:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierstudent_papers/133
dc.identifier.contextkey15976365
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5642
dc.description.abstractIn 2017, Connecticut enacted new fiscal restrictions to cap state spending, revenue volatility, appropriations, and bonding, which were to be “locked” in bond covenants and enforced via contract. This marks a startling turn in state tax and expenditure limits (TELs). Peer states have statutory or constitutional guardrails on the budgeting process, but none hands such great control to the bondholders. Now, using the threat of a lawsuit, Connecticut’s bondholders can block lawmakers from amending the fiscal caps as economic circumstances evolve over time. Far from a budgetary best practice, the fiscal restrictions are likely to impair Connecticut’s long-term economic health. Accordingly, this Paper presents several strategies for safely exiting the “bond lock” covenants and restoring budgetary control to the General Assembly.
dc.titleThe Bondholder’s Budget: Connecticut’s Experiment in Tax and Expenditure Limits
dc.source.journaltitleStudent Scholarship Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:50:47Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/student_papers/133
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1134&context=student_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Bondholder_s_Budget_Final.pdf
Size:
8.351Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record