Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmar, Akhil
dc.contributor.authorLerner, Renee
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:56.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:49:30Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:49:30Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/993
dc.identifier.contextkey1666437
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5415
dc.description.abstractThe Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment is an unsolved riddle of vast proportions, a Gordian knot in the middle of our Bill of Rights. From the beginning it lacked an easily identifiable rationale; in 1789, the words of the clause were more a slogan than a clearly defined legal rule, and in the preceding four centuries the slogan had stood for at least four different ideas. Today, things are no better: the clause continues to confound and confuse. Because courts and commentators have been unable to deduce what the privilege is for, they have failed to define its scope in the most logical and sensible way. In this article we try our hand at solving the riddle and untying the Gordian knot. We propose both a rationale for, and a definition of the proper scope of, the Self-Incrimination Clause.
dc.titleFifth Amendment First Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:49:30Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/993
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1957&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Fifth_Amendment_First_Principl ...
Size:
4.962Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record