Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmar, Akhil
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:56.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:49:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:49:29Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/985
dc.identifier.citationAkhil Reed Amar, Reconstructing Double Jeopardy: Some Thoughts on the Rodney King Case, 26 CUMB. L. REV. 1 (1995).
dc.identifier.contextkey1666468
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5406
dc.description.abstractYesterday I tried to suggest, that in doing Constitutional Law, we must think about the founding vision and also about how that founding vision may have been modified by a reconstruction vision. Yesterday's application of this approach involved freedom of expression and religious liberty. Today I would like to focus on a different application-double jeopardy. The double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment provides that "[n]o person shall ... be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb."
dc.titleReconstructing Double Jeopardy: Some Thoughts On the Rodney King Case
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:49:29Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/985
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1965&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Reconstructing_Double_Jeopardy ...
Size:
832.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record