Convergences: Law, Literature, and Feminism
dc.contributor.author | Resnik, Judith | |
dc.contributor.author | Heilbrun, Carolyn | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:55.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:49:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:49:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/909 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1665607 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5322 | |
dc.description.abstract | One of us is a professor of law, the other a professor of literature, and both of us are professed feminists. To teach together, the obvious joint venture was feminism. Hence the title of a course: "Feminist Theory: Law and Literature" and our intensive study of the emerging field of "law and literature." But when we delved into the newly-minted discipline, we found to our dismay (and even, admitting, never-ending naiveté) that like both "law" and "literature," much of that hyphenated field examines a world in which white men attempt from a place of power to speak as if for us all. Elizabeth Villiers Gemmette has, for example, described law and literature classes given in thirty-eight law schools. Only one of the reading lists surveyed included "feminism" as a topic; most of the courses ignored women's voices altogether. Robin West and Judith Koffler have also provided excellent critiques and suggestions for work in the field of law and literature; their efforts have not until recently, however, specifically touched on the necessity for reading literary works that represent woman and her particular demands upon the law as seen in fiction. | |
dc.title | Convergences: Law, Literature, and Feminism | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:49:16Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/909 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1925&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |