Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReisman, W. Michael
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:55.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:49:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:49:09Z
dc.date.issued1990-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/874
dc.identifier.contextkey1664347
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5284
dc.description.abstractArbitration is a delegated and restricted power to make certain types of decisions in certain prescribed ways. Any restricted delegation of power must have some system of control. Controls are techniques or mechanisms in engineered artifacts, whether physical or social, whose function is to ensure that an artifact works the way it was designed to work. In social and legal arrangements in which a limited power is delegated, control systems are essential; without them, the putative restrictions disappear and the limited power may become absolute. The impulse to establish control systems in political processes imports a dynamic conception of social and political processes on which, as is wellknown, the United States constitutional experiment is based.
dc.titleThe Breakdown of the Control Mechanism in ICSID Arbitration
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:49:09Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/874
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1864&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Breakdown_of_the_Control_M ...
Size:
1.303Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record