Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuke, Steven
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:54.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:49:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:49:00Z
dc.date.issued1966-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/824
dc.identifier.citationSteven Duke, Prosecutions for Attempts to Evade Income Tax: A Discordant View of a Procedural Hybrid, 76 YALE LJ 1 (1966).
dc.identifier.contextkey1652830
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5229
dc.description.abstractLegal proscriptions have proliferated at a Parkinsonian rate during the twentieth century, along with the officials who enforce them. Administrative agencies have assumed much of the prosecutor's prerogative of selecting targets for sanctions. Courts and juries, along with the prosecutor, have surrendered discretion to the agencies, as fact finding, law application, and law determination have all become part of the administrative process.
dc.titleProsecutions for Attempts to Evade Income Tax: A Discordant View of a Procedural Hybrid
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:49:00Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/824
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1812&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Prosecutions_for_Attempts_to_E ...
Size:
5.019Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record