Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReisman, W. Michael
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:53.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:48:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:48:46Z
dc.date.issued1989-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/747
dc.identifier.contextkey1646022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5146
dc.description.abstractOn two occasions in the recent past, the International Court of Justice has misstated its own prior holdings by selective quotation. In each instance, the partial quotation was invoked as authority for the opposite of what the previous Court had said. Neither matter was de minimis: in each instance, the issue for which authority was being sought was central either to the case at bar or to an important aspect of the Court's role. The consequences for the future of international adjudication and the stability of authoritative expectation, which is such an important strut of international law, are serious and merit examination.
dc.titleRespecting One's Own Jurisprudence: A Plea to the International Court of Justice
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:48:46Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/747
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1750&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Respecting_One_s_Own_Jurisprud ...
Size:
377.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record