Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLangbein, John
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:51.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:48:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:48:09Z
dc.date.issued1979-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/544
dc.identifier.citationJohn H Langbein, Understanding the short history of plea bargaining, 13 LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW 261 (1979).
dc.identifier.contextkey1627942
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4922
dc.description.abstractAs late as the eighteenth century, ordinary jury trial at common law was a judge-dominated, lawyer-free procedure conducted so rapidly that plea bargaining was unnecessary. Thereafter, the rise of adversary procedure and the law of evidence injected vast complexity into jury trial and made it unworkable as a routine dispositive procedure. A variety of factors, some quite fortuitous, inclined nineteenthcentury common law procedure to channel the mounting caseload into nontrial plea bargaining procedure rather than to refine its trial procedure as contemporary Continental legal systems were doing.
dc.titleUnderstanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:48:09Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/544
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1545&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Understanding_the_Short_Histor ...
Size:
541.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record