Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchleicher, David
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:51.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:48:01Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:48:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/5335
dc.identifier.contextkey14221281
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4877
dc.description.abstractWriting a "surreply" in a law review symposium is almost always a mistake. The author of the initial piece is inevitably motivated by conflicting and counterproductive impulses. Initially, the author will always experience an overwhelming feeling of gratitude that leading scholars took the time to write responses. I certainly feel this. The four responses to my article, Stuck! The Law and Economics of Residential Stagnation, are serious, in-depth, and thoughtful. I am very grateful to their four respective authors. But focusing on one's appreciation leads to saccharine responses, better fodder for thank you notes than for the pages of a law journal.
dc.titleSurreply: How and Why We Should Become Un-Stuck!
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:48:01Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/5335
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6339&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Surreply__How_and_Why_We_Shoul ...
Size:
1.057Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record