Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreenhouse, Linda
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Reva
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:50.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:47:55Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:47:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/5296
dc.identifier.contextkey13157807
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4837
dc.description.abstractAs the case that became Whole Woman's Health worked its way to the Supreme Court, few were confident about how the Court would respond to a law, enacted in the name of protecting women's health, that would predictably shut most of a state's abortion clinics. All agreed that the governing standard was the undue burden framework the Court had adopted a quarter century earlier in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
dc.titleThe Difference a Whole Woman Makes: Protection for the Abortion Right After Whole Woman's Health
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:47:55Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/5296
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6309&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
LindaGreenhouseRevaBSiegel.pdf
Size:
897.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record