Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Muneer
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:50.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:47:49Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:47:49Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/5257
dc.identifier.contextkey12314109
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4805
dc.description.abstractFor more than a decade, a single rubric for legalization of the 11 million undocumented people in the United States has dominated every major proposal for comprehensive immigration reform, and continues to do so today: earned citizenship. Introduced as a rhetorical move intended to distinguish such proposals from amnesty, the earned citizenship frame has shaped the substantive provisions of the legislation by conditioning legalization on the performance of economic, cultural, and civic metrics. In order to regularize status, earned citizenship would require undocumented individuals to demonstrate their ongoing societal contributions at multiple intervals over a probationary period of many years, and they would remain subject to deportation for failure to do so. Such a behavioral approach expresses a particular moral basis for legalization and a normative vision of citizenship, and it aspires to place millions of people on a path to citizenship. And yet, despite the centrality of earned citizenship in contemporary immigration debates and the magnitude of its ambition, there has been virtually no scholarly treatment of its substance, ideology, or normative claims. While the election of Donald Trump has rendered progressive immigration reform improbable in the next several years, this is all the more reason to examine the failed logic and structure of recent reform proposals. This Article explores the origins and illuminates the deep structure of earned citizenship, and it critically evaluates its virtues and shortcomings as matters of politics, morality, policy, and law. Although laudable for its inclusionary promise, earned citizenship suffers from serious and previously unaddressed theoretical and conceptual flaws that reinscribe the moral claims of restrictionists, illuminate and imperil our larger understandings of citizenship, and invite consideration of alternative frameworks for legalization. The rightward electoral shift has closed a window for progressive reform for now, but when it is next pried open, a different moral and legal framework for legalization may be required.
dc.titleBeyond Earned Citizenship
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:47:50Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/5257
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6257&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
MuneerIAhmadBeyondEarnedC.pdf
Size:
3.073Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record