• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of openYLSCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    The Politics of Sentencing Reform: The Legislative History of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    The_Politics_of_Sentencing_Ref ...
    Size:
    5.751Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Stith, Kate
    Koh, Steve
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/480
    Abstract
    The United States Sentencing Commission was long in gestation. It was during the 94th Congress, in late 1975, that Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Democrat from Massachusetts then in his thirteenth year on the Senate Judiciary Committee, originally introduced legislation to establish the Commission. Nine years later, with the Senator in his twenty-second year on the Judiciary Committee (though now in the minority party), President Ronald Reagan signed the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, which had passed both Houses of Congress by overwhelming majorities. In our recounting of the legislative history of federal sentencing reform, we tell three interwoven stories. One tale concerns the subtle transformation of sentencing reform legislation: conceived by liberal reformers as an anti-imprisonment and antidiscrimination measure, but finally born as part of a more conservative law-and-order crime control measure. A second tale recounts Congress' failure, as suggested by Justice Scalia in his dissent in Mistretta v. United States, to resolve several significant sentencing issues, thereby assuring that key political decisions would be made by the commissioners appointed by the President. Finally, we discuss the federal judiciary's failure to persuade Congress of the potentially untoward consequences of transferring sentencing authority from individual federal judges to an administrative sentencing commission- a bureaucracy which predictably has proved to be even less responsive to judicial concerns than Congress.
    Collections
    Faculty Scholarship Series

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.