Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGordon, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:50.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:47:38Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:47:38Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/5197
dc.identifier.citationRobert W Gordon, “Critical Legal Histories revisited”: a response, 37 LAW & SOCIAL INQUIRY 200 (2012).
dc.identifier.contextkey12228717
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4739
dc.description.abstractIt is of course very gratifying that anyone should think that an article written over twenty-five years ago might still be worth reading, and even organize a symposium around. (It is also rather discomfiting, since it is hard to say what one dreads most to find in the old stuff: evidence of youthful folly or, worse, evidence that one was wiser and better with words a long time ago.) I am moved beyond measure by the perceptiveness and seriousness of these comments from critics who are also friends.
dc.title"Critical Legal Histories Revisited": A Response
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:47:39Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/5197
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6209&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Critical_Legal_Histories_Revis ...
Size:
1.154Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record