Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStith, Kate
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:15.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:35:18Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:35:18Z
dc.date.issued1977-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1264
dc.identifier.contextkey1694594
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/470
dc.description.abstractAlthough the Supreme Court has hinted in recent years that illegitimacy may be a suspect classification for equal protection purposes, a six-man majority firmly rejected this proposition last Term in Mathews v. Lucas. Employing “less than strictest scrutiny,” the Court went on to uphold provisions relating to survivors' benefits of the Social Security Act that denied one group of illegitimate children the conclusive presumption of eligibility given to all other children.
dc.titleDiscrimination Against Illegitimate Children
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:35:18Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1264
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2285&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Discrimination_Against_Illegit ...
Size:
640.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record