Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrilmayer, Lea
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yunsieg
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:49.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:47:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:47:29Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/5141
dc.identifier.citationLea Brilmayer & Yunsieg P Kim, Model or Muddle: Quantitative Modeling and the Facade of Modernization of Law, 56 WASHBURN LJ 1 (2017).
dc.identifier.contextkey12183744
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4678
dc.description.abstractOnce considered fairly exotic, the appearance of mathematical formulae in legal cases and scholarly literature has now become relatively commonplace. One would not have predicted this development from the phenomenon's humble beginnings. The earliest attempts at quantification were nothing more than simple calls to compile more accurate statistics. Such efforts led the Harvard Law Review in 1930 to quote with apparent approval a book editor, who lamented the "absence of current criminal statistics" and argued that "[t]he time is rapidly approaching ... when. . . every specialist in educational research must at the same time be a statistician."
dc.titleModel or Muddle? Quantitative Modeling and the Façade of "Modernization" in Law
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:47:29Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/5141
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6151&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Model_or_Muddle_Quantitative_M ...
Size:
1.858Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record