Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStone Sweet, Alec
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:49.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:47:05Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:47:05Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4994
dc.identifier.contextkey7927294
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4529
dc.description.abstractJudicial lawmaking constitutes the primary mechanism for the progressive construction of international law today. International judges and arbitrators make law, as a by-product of their functions as dispute-resolvers, not least, through interpreting norms found in treaties and other recognized sources of law. They do so, increasingly, in dialogues with judges across jurisdictional boundaries. In this contribution to the 2013 Symposium of the New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, we explore these themes, focusing in particular on how judges and arbitrators have developed general principles of law.
dc.titlePROPORTIONALITY, GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW, AND INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION: A RESPONSE TO JOSE ALVAREZ
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:47:05Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4994
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5981&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
46NYUJIntlLPol911.pdf
Size:
2.313Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record