Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyres, Ian
dc.contributor.authorAckerman, Bruce
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:15.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:35:12Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:35:12Z
dc.date.issued2003-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1237
dc.identifier.citationBruce Ackerman & Ian Ayese, The New Paradigm Revisited, 91 CALIF. L. REV. 743 (2003).
dc.identifier.contextkey1679209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/440
dc.description.abstractLet's begin with the very idea of a "new paradigm": are there distinctive ideas organizing our particular proposals, and if so, what are they? Our commentators profess varying degrees of skepticism, and we hope to allay their doubts with a two-part answer. The first emphasizes principle; the second is more pragmatic. We begin with a framework that isolates our basic normative concerns; we continue with an instrumental assessment of the "secret donation booth" as a policy tool; we conclude by asking whether these principled and pragmatic perspectives provide the basis for a "new paradigm"—a distinctive and coherent approach to the problem of campaign finance.
dc.titleThe New Paradigm Revisited
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:35:12Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1237
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2236&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
New_Paradigm_Revisited__The.pdf
Size:
476.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record