Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGluck, Abbe
dc.contributor.authorBressman, Lisa
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:47.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:46:39Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:46:39Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4845
dc.identifier.contextkey5757209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4373
dc.description.abstractWhat role should the realities of the legislative drafting process play in the theories and doctrines of statutory interpretation and administrative law? The ongoing debates frequently turn on empirical assumptions about how Congress drafts and what interpretive rules Congress knows, but, until now, there has been almost no testing of those assumptions. This is the first of two Articles reporting the results of the most extensive empirical study to date—a survey of 137 congressional staffers drawn from both parties, both chambers of Congress, and spanning multiple committees—on topics ranging from their knowledge and use of the canons of interpretation, to legislative history, the administrative law deference doctrines, the legislative process, and the courts-Congress relationship.
dc.titleStatutory Interpretation from the Inside -- An Empirical Study of Congressional Drafting, Delegation, and the Canons: Part I
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:46:39Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4845
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5851&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Statutory_Interpretation_from_ ...
Size:
1.398Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record