Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFiss, Owen
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:15.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:35:10Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:35:10Z
dc.date.issued1971-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1226
dc.identifier.contextkey1678681
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/428
dc.description.abstractBrown v. Board of Education stands for the proposition that the equal protection clause prohibits the operation of a "dual school system" and requires the conversion of that system into a "unitary nonracial school system." Under a dual system, students are assigned to schools on the basis of their race in order to segregate them. That is clearly impermissible. But what is a permissible basis for assigning students to schools under a "unitary nonracial school system"? This seems to be the central riddle of the law of school desegregation.
dc.titleThe Charlotte-Mecklenburg Case -- Its Significance for Northern School Desegregation
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:35:10Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1226
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2195&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Charlotte_Mecklenburg_Case ...
Size:
260.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record