Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLorenzen, Ernest
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:44.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:45:49Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:45:49Z
dc.date.issued1923-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4565
dc.identifier.contextkey4653283
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4070
dc.description.abstractA study of the American decisions relating to the statute of frauds from the standpoint of the Conflict of Laws reveals the fact that there exists the greatest divergence of opinion with respect to contracts falling within the fourth and seventeenth sections of the original English statute of frauds. It is the purpose of this article to consider the problems that have been raised in connection with these cases, and to suggest a solution. Of the contracts falling within the fourth section of the statute of frauds those presented to the courts involving the Conflict of Laws have been generally contracts not to he performed within a year, contracts of guaranty, and contracts relating to land.
dc.titleStatute of Frauds and the Conflict of Laws
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:45:49Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4565
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5577&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Statute_of_Frauds_and_the_Conf ...
Size:
1.388Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record