Conflicting Ideals for Reorganization

dc.contributor.author	Foster, Roger
dc.date	2021-11-25T13:34:43.000
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-26T11:45:30Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-26T11:45:30Z
dc.date.issued	1935-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifier	fss_papers/4458
dc.identifier.citation	Roger S Foster, Conflicting Ideals for Reorganization, 44 YALE LJ 923 (1934).
dc.identifier.contextkey	4222193
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3952
dc.description.abstract	Most of the recent literature dealing with reorganization and the reorganization amendments to the Bankruptcy Act has emphasized reorganization procedure, and properly so. Abuses conceived to have existed in the past have been primarily procedural. The general tenor of reform objective has been to shift control over reorganization from investment bankers to the security holders themselves or to public authority.
dc.subject	bankruptcy
dc.subject	organization
dc.subject	politics
dc.title	Conflicting Ideals for Reorganization
dc.source.journaltitle	Faculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA	2021-11-26T11:45:30Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4458
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5470&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1

Name:

Conflicting_Ideals_for_Reorgan ...

Size:

5.101Mb

Format:

PDF