Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreen, Leon
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:43.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:45:30Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:45:30Z
dc.date.issued1929-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4456
dc.identifier.citationLeon Green, Analysis of Tort Cases, 35 W. VA. LQ 323 (1928).
dc.identifier.contextkey4222138
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3950
dc.description.abstractThe discussion of any problem of law must begin with the assumption that it can be adequately handled by some accepted legal theory, or that it can be made to submit to some such theory yet to be designed. An adequate working hypothesis is as necessary to a legal science as to any other science. Needless to say there has been no comprehensive system of legal theory designed to take care of all the problems which arise under government. Any system which there may be is made up of numerous fragmentary parts, each fashioned to handle a particular group of problems, and even these larger parts are made up of still smaller fragments. For instance, there are groups of contract problems, agency problems, corporation problems, tort problems, but each one of these groups is controlled by a conglomerate of theories rather than by a single theory. Difficulties and misunderstandings arise largely out of the clashings and contradictions of a multitude of helter-skelter theories improvised for the day and perpetuated to plague legal science indefinitely.
dc.subjectlegal theory
dc.subjecttort
dc.subjectjudicial process
dc.titleAnalysis of Tort Cases
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:45:30Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4456
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5461&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Analysis_of_Tort_Cases.pdf
Size:
644.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record