Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreen, Leon
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:43.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:45:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:45:29Z
dc.date.issued1928-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4454
dc.identifier.contextkey4222146
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3948
dc.description.abstractThe undertaking to restate the rules and principles developed by the English and American courts finds'in the field of torts a most hopeless task. A loose classification permits an infinite variety of types of conduct to be classed as torts. The rules, for most part, which govern these cases are still liquid. Only the types of conduct which are also designated crimes can be said to be subject to crystallized rules of tort law. Even here the definiteness and certainty ordinarily assumed are illusory. If this bulk of law has not yet been crystallized by the judicial process. in what manner can legal scholars speed up the process? And what is more, where are the stabilizing factors to be found?
dc.subjecttort
dc.subjectnegligence
dc.subjectcourts
dc.titleThe Duty Problem in Negligence Cases
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:45:29Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4454
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5463&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Duty_Problem_in_Negligence ...
Size:
3.595Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record