Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGetman, Julius
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorBrett, Jeanne
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:42.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:45:19Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:45:19Z
dc.date.issued1984-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4399
dc.identifier.contextkey4200176
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3886
dc.description.abstractIn Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality [hereinafter cited as Law and Reality], we examined the desirability of continued National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regulation of pre-election campaigning. Our central finding, based upon a study of thirty-one elections and interviews with over a thousand employees, was that unlawful campaigning has no greater effect on employee voting behavior in union representation elections than does lawful campaigning. Hence, we recommended that the Board should no longer attempt to distinguish between lawful and unlawful campaigning; that the results of an election, once conducted, should be final; that speech should be wholly free; and that the Board should neither set aside elections nor find unfair labor practices based on oral or written communications by an employer or a union.
dc.subjectNational Labor Relations Board
dc.subjectelections
dc.subjectlabor
dc.titleRelationship Between Free Choice and Labor Board Doctrine: Differing Empirical Approaches
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:45:19Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4399
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5408&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Relationship_Between_Free_Choi ...
Size:
955.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record