Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCohen, Felix
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:42.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:45:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:45:11Z
dc.date.issued1951-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4361
dc.identifier.contextkey4178429
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3846
dc.description.abstractMy role in this symposium is a modest one: it is to clear the ring for the feature fight of the program between Dean Brown and Professor Hartman. I am to sweep away some of the rubbish in the ring that often gets in the way of a clean battle on issues of ethics. I think the most serious rubbish that needs to be swept away is the widely prevailing notion that ethics is something off in the clouds, or off in some never-never land of Utopia, something uncertain and subjective, whereas the law is something that is very definite, clear, hard, here and now. Of course, if that were true, there would be no point in trying to apply ethical doctrines to actual cases.
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectdispute
dc.subjectlaw
dc.titleJudicial Ethics
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:45:11Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4361
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5361&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Judicial_Ethics.pdf
Size:
704.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record