Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArnold, Thurman
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:41.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:44:50Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:44:50Z
dc.date.issued1932-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4258
dc.identifier.contextkey4158851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3731
dc.description.abstractThere seems to be a general assumption today that the "Science of Law " is not adequately performing its function in the judicial process. When a great lawyer can voice the general opinion of the bar in stating that the confusion and uncertainty caused by a vast mass of decisions and principles is growing worse from year to year, it is inevitable that various conflicting attitudes toward this science should take the place of a former uncritical acceptance.
dc.titleThe Role of Substantive Law and Procedure in the Legal Process
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:44:50Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4258
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5252&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
45HarvLRev617.pdf
Size:
1.675Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record