Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColeman, Jules
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:41.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:44:41Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:44:41Z
dc.date.issued1992-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4208
dc.identifier.contextkey4158602
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3676
dc.description.abstractThese remarks are stimulated by Professor Wendy Gordon's ambitious and extremely interesting article On Owning Information: Intellectual Property and the Restitutionary Impulse. Professor Gordon identifies some current trends in the law of what she variously refers to as "intangible" or "intellectual" property. In doing so, she emphasizes the expansion of legal protection afforded certain property claims in intellectual resources and considers possible motivations for the change in legal attitude, notably the increasing economic importance of intangibles. Professor Gordon rightly notes that more protective common law causes of action may be economically counterproductive. In her view, legal protection of intangibles has increased in two important ways. The first concerns the domain of protected interests; the second concerns the nature of the protection given the relevant interests. Professor Gordon identifies two principles underlying the expansion of both the domain and the nature of intellectual property law. These are: (1) the principle of reap/sow, and (2) the principle of unjust enrichment.
dc.titleIntellectual Property and Corrective Justice
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:44:41Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4208
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5204&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
78VaLRev283.pdf
Size:
155.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record