Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDeutsch, Jan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:44:10Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:44:10Z
dc.date.issued1982-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4041
dc.identifier.contextkey4083599
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3493
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the Delaware Supreme Court decision of Zapata Corporation v. Maldonado and attempts to determine whether the opinion is good law. The author contends that the decision will lead to more litigation as there is no clear indication as to what makes a corporation's business judgment not to pursue a court action justifiable. However, only time will tell if it is a good precedent.
dc.subjectlitigation
dc.subjectconflict reso­lution
dc.subjectfiduciary duty
dc.titleZapata Corporation v Maldonado
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:44:10Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4041
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5036&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Zapata_Corp._v_Maldonado.pdf
Size:
3.103Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record