Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Edward
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:44:05Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:44:05Z
dc.date.issued1919-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4020
dc.identifier.contextkey4072024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3470
dc.description.abstractOur present military code has come to us without fundamental change from the British Articles of War of 1765, which owed their origin to Rome. Whether or not this may tend to account for the remarkable indefiniteness of the punitive articles or help to explain some of the procedural peculiarities of the system, the fact remains that many of the concepts of the existing law military are so foreign to American jurisprudence as to startle and perplex the American lawyer.
dc.titleExisting Court-Martial System and the Ansell Army Articles
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:44:05Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4020
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5017&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
29YaleLJ52.pdf
Size:
1.446Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record