Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbel, Richard
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:44:04Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:44:04Z
dc.date.issued1974-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4012
dc.identifier.contextkey4071286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3461
dc.description.abstractProfessor Spalding's response to my review is marred by some egregious errors -- e.g., his confusion of the concepts of "hypothesis" and "value," which are used interchangeably and often incorrectly. He also indulges in intemperate and inappropriate language, as I believe a careful reading of my review and his reply will show. I hope, however, that the handful of readers whose interest is piqued by this debate are not simply entertained by its rhetoric, but are moved to go and study Professor Spalding's book. If they do, I would ask them to bear in mind the following statements of value (in the sense of subjective, untestable assumptions and preferences) which I brought to my criticism of his book.
dc.titleRejoinder to Professor Spalding
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:44:04Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4012
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5009&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10AfrLStud145.pdf
Size:
80.74Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record