Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbert, Lee
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:44:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:44:02Z
dc.date.issued1974-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4004
dc.identifier.contextkey4071280
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3452
dc.description.abstractA grant of accelerated review has brought the new Watergate tapes controversy to the Supreme Court for decision this summer. The main dispute is over Special Prosecutor Jaworski's need for additional presidential tapes to prepare for Watergate-related trials and President Nixon's reliance on executive privilege in resisting a subpoena. But with the President's surprise attack on Mr. Jaworski's authority to sue the President, new and relatively unexplored issues have been raised. Two authorities, Professors Bickel and Bator, have exchanged conflicting views on the issue in the New York Times. Although providing a framework for discussion, these articles, we believe, indicate a need for a response and a fuller analysis than Op Ed columns allow.
dc.titleEnforcing Subpoenas against the President: The Question of Mr. Jaworski's Authority
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:44:02Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4004
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5005&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
74ColumbiaLawReview545.pdf
Size:
330.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record