Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbert, Lee
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:44:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:44:02Z
dc.date.issued1974-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/4003
dc.identifier.citationLee A Albert, Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth, JSTOR 1360 (1974).
dc.identifier.contextkey4071281
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3451
dc.description.abstractExecutive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth succinctly defines the privilege as a "President's claim of constitutional authority to withhold information from Congress" (p. 1). Its thesis, simply asserted, is that any such claim is a constitutional "myth" (p. 1). The book's formidable undertaking is to demonstrate, purportedly with unequivocal proof, that a President's refusal to disclose is an unlawful encroachment on Congress' constitutional power of inquiry into the executive branch. Whether broad or narrow, executive privilege cannot be legitimated by reconciling or balancing competing values or by "pruning a branch here or there; the axe must be put to the root" (p. 264) of this unconstitutional practice.
dc.titleExecutive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:44:02Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4003
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5006&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
74ColumbiaLawReview.pdf
Size:
191.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record