Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMashaw, Jerry
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:14.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:34:55Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:34:55Z
dc.date.issued1988-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1145
dc.identifier.contextkey1675919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/339
dc.description.abstractI agree with Cass Sunstein that the time has come to develop the implications of republicanism, or "neo-republicanism," for American public law. After all, if being a republican means having a commitment to some version of democratic self-governance, combined with an aspiration for collective decisionmaking that goes beyond the mere aggregation of individual preference into some vector of "public" decisions, most of us can easily view ourselves as republicans. The crucial question has to do with the concrete meaning of republicanism for American public law and public institutions.
dc.titleAs-If-Republican Interpretation
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:34:55Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1145
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2156&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
As_If_Republican_Interpretation.pdf
Size:
1.075Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record