Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorResnik, Judith
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:38.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:43:31Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:43:31Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3860
dc.identifier.contextkey3234628
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3292
dc.description.abstractI begin with the centerpiece of the conflict about the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA)—the civil rights remedy of VAWA.2 Its words were both carefully thought out and negotiated, and hence the exact terms are important to know. Key to what Congress entitled the “Civil Rights” remedy of VAWA is its provision: “All persons within the United States shall have the right to be free from crimes of violence motivated by gender . . . .” In addition, Congress specified a right to obtain supplemental remedies in federal court atop what other provisions might be available under state law—provided to “all persons” subjected to what VAWA recognized as violations of liberty, autonomy, and equality.
dc.titleDrafting, Lobbying, and Litigating VAWA: National, Local, and Transnational Interventions on Behalf of Women's Equality
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:43:31Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3860
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4873&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Drafting.pdf
Size:
77.94Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record