Our Federalism(s)
dc.contributor.author | Gerken, Heather | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:38.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:43:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:43:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/3819 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 3206647 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3246 | |
dc.description.abstract | Like all academics, federalism scholars typically divide into camps. Some favor state sovereignty; others favor state autonomy. Some insist that states require formal, judicially enforceable protections against federal intrusion; others favor the informal protections afforded by the political process. Some favor cooperative federalism; others are not even sure that cooperative regimes can properly be called federalism. Scholars even divide as to the source of state power in its ongoing competition with the national government. Some imagine states occupying a separate sphere from the federal government. Others assume that some level of state-federal integration is not just inevitable but healthy. Still others imagine that it is useful to have states serve as fully integrated administrative units within the federal system. | |
dc.title | Our Federalism(s) | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:43:23Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3819 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4833&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |