Declaratory Judgments in Indiana
dc.contributor.author | Borchard, Edwin | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:36.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:42:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:42:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1944-01-01T00:00:00-07:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/3636 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Edwin Borchard, Declaratory Judgments In Indiana, 19 IND. LJ 175 (1943). | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 3039328 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3053 | |
dc.description.abstract | On March 5, 1927, Indiana adopted the Uniform Act on Declaratory Judgments. Since then this reform in procedure has had in Indiana a somewhat checkered career. Beginning slowly to apply the statute, the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality by inference in 1930 in a case brought by certain taxpayers against the State Board of Tax Commissioners and the City of South Bend, alleging that a statute conferring revisory taxing powers on the State Board was unconstitutional. Constitutionality was squarely upheld upon allegations of non-justiciability in 1935, when the court upheld the propriety of an action for the construction of a contract for the sale of stock and the application to the purchase price of certain funds. A few judges had stumbled over this hurdle, believing the declaration of rights to be an advisory opinion, a hypothetical case, or for other reasons not to involve a justiciable controversy. | |
dc.title | Declaratory Judgments in Indiana | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:42:48Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3636 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4631&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |