Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBorchard, Edwin
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:36.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:42:38Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:42:38Z
dc.date.issued1938-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3581
dc.identifier.contextkey2456666
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/3001
dc.description.abstractSome of the social-political theories which influenced the framers of the Constitution were derived from Locke, Hume, Harrington, Coke and Blackstone. These men were less concerned with forms of government than with the relation between society as a whole and its individual members. They were sure that the individual possessed certain indefeasible, primordial rights and that government was designed to protect these rights against encroachment by the state or by classes within it. Perhaps the most important of these private rights was that of property, associated by Locke with liberty and often identified with it.' Thus, the effort of the British Parliament to levy distasteful taxes and impose commercial restrictions was pictured in America as a challenge to fundamental theories of government.
dc.subjectLocke
dc.subjectHume
dc.subjectHarrington
dc.subjectCoke
dc.subjectBlackstone
dc.subjectHenry
dc.subjectPaine
dc.subjectParliament
dc.subjectproperty
dc.subjectliberty
dc.titleSupreme Court and Private Rights
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:42:38Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3581
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4581&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Supreme_Court_and_Private_Righ ...
Size:
1.890Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record