Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Reva
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:14.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:34:48Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:34:48Z
dc.date.issued2001-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1107
dc.identifier.contextkey1674359
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/299
dc.description.abstractThe American feminist movement has twice mobilized for constitutional change. The constitutional amendment secured by the first-wave feminist movement is no longer of consequence, while the constitutional amendment sought by the second-wave feminist movement was never ratified. Yet today, courts and commentators agree that the Constitution guarantees women equality, even if that guarantee was never specifically authorized by the Constitution's framers. What understanding of our constitutional tradition might we glean from this story of constitutional change?
dc.titleText in Contest: Gender and the Constitution from a Social Movement Perspective
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:34:48Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1107
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2115&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Text_in_Contest___Gender_and_t ...
Size:
3.223Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record