Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Reva
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:14.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:34:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2006-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1097
dc.identifier.contextkey1674460
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/292
dc.description.abstractSocial movements change the ways Americans understand the Constitution. Social movement conflict, enabled and constrained by constitutional culture, can create new forms of constitutional understanding-a dynamic that guides officials interpreting the open-textured language of the Constitution's rights guarantees. To show how constitutional culture channels social movement conflict to produce enforceable constitutional understandings, I consider how equal protection doctrine prohibiting sex discrimination was forged in the Equal Rights Amendment's defeat.
dc.titleConstitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the de facto ERA
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:34:46Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1097
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2125&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Constitutional_Culture__Social ...
Size:
2.215Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record