Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarper, Fowler
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:42:24Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:42:24Z
dc.date.issued1930-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3511
dc.identifier.citationFowler Vincent Harper, Jurisdiction of the States to Tax--Recent Developments, 5 IND. LJ 507 (1929).
dc.identifier.contextkey2407130
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2925
dc.description.abstractThe recent case of Farmers Loan and Trust Company v. Minnesota again raises the interesting and all-important question of how far a state may go under the Fourteenth Amendment in taxing property to which it has in one way or other some connection. The Supreme Court here held that the State of Minne- sota could not impose an inheritance tax upon the testamentary transfer of bonds and obligations of Minnesota municipal corporations kept by the owner in New York, where he had been domiciled and where his will was probated, none of such bonds and obligations having any connection with any business conducted by or on behalf of decedent in Minnesota.
dc.subjectJurisdiction of the States to Tax—Recent Developments
dc.subject5 Indiana Law Journal 507 (1930)
dc.titleJurisdiction of the States to Tax—Recent Developments
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:42:24Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3511
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4554&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Jurisdiction_of_the_States_to_ ...
Size:
1.513Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record