Review of a Review

dc.contributor.author	Clark, Charles
dc.date	2021-11-25T13:34:34.000
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-26T11:42:00Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-26T11:42:00Z
dc.date.issued	1931-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifier	fss_papers/3391
dc.identifier.contextkey	2353178
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2801
dc.description.abstract	To the Editor of the Michigan Law Review: In an interesting review of Walsh on Equity, in 29 Mich. L. Rev. 1122 (June 1931), Professor Clarence D. Walsh appears to ascribe to me parenthood for some pleading concepts set forth in that excellent treatise (of which I heartily approve; compare my review in 8 New York University Law Quarterly Review 521, March, 1931). Although these ideas have been supported by able writers and courts for some time, I should not object to the honor but for the fact that Professor Laylin also seems to assume premises which in my opinion are most inimical to code reform.
dc.subject	Review of a Review
dc.subject	30 Michigan Law Review 164 (1931)
dc.title	Review of a Review
dc.source.journaltitle	Faculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA	2021-11-26T11:42:01Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3391
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4394&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1

Name:

Review_of_a_Review.pdf

Size:

496.0Kb

Format:

PDF

Related items