Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:34.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:56Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:56Z
dc.date.issued1920-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3366
dc.identifier.contextkey2347703
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2773
dc.description.abstractAn interesting application of an old common-law doctrine in a civil law state is found in Ducros v. St. Bernard Cypress Co. (1918, La.) 82 So. 841. The plaintiff sued for the value of certain timber which he alleged the defendant, in possession claiming title, had cut and removed from his land. The court held that the petition disclosed no cause of action since the plaintiff was in effect suing for a disturbance of possession, which he could not do where the defendant claimed title to the realty, until the question of ownership had been settled.
dc.subjectTrial of Title to Realty in a Personal Action
dc.subject29 Yale Law Journal 539 (1920)
dc.titleTrial of Title to Realty in a Personal Action
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:56Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3366
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4341&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Trial_of_Title_to_Realty_in_a_ ...
Size:
666.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record