Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKahn, Paul
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:34.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:46Z
dc.date.issued1996-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/332
dc.identifier.contextkey1613520
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2722
dc.description.abstractState constitutionalism has always seemed a poor step-sister to federal constitutionalism. When the federal courts were robust in their review of state law, no one thought too seriously about the problem of state constitutional review. To the degree that anyone worried about federalism, they worried about federal interference with the state legal processes. Not more judging, but less—from whatever source—was the concern of those who spoke in favor of federalism. A profound change in the character of federal constitutionalism has occurred in the last generation. Modem recourse to state constitutionalism is a complex reaction to this change.
dc.titleState Constitutionalism and the Problems of Fairness
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:47Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/332
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1331&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
State_Constitutionalism_and_th ...
Size:
892.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record