Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKahn, Paul
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:41Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:41Z
dc.date.issued2000-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/329
dc.identifier.contextkey1613493
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2689
dc.description.abstractHegemony is a concept of political power. It speaks to a global order structured by asymmetries of power. Modern law, in contrast, begins with an idea of equality among subjects. For domestic law, this is an equality among individuals; for international law, it is an equality among states. Legal outcomes are determined by identifying claims of right, not by measuring assertions of power. In the domestic order, we understand law by contrasting it with politics; we speak of the courts as the nonpolitical branch of government. Similarly, international institutions with legal responsibilities distinguish themselves from political decision-makers. The Security Council may provide for a great power veto, but there is no similar reflection of political power within the International Court of Justice. Just for this reason, appeals to international law have been one of the tools available to weaker states in their battles with more powerful states. Conversely, powerful states have been wary of adjudicatory mechanisms for settling disputes.
dc.titleSpeaking Law to Power: Popular Sovereignty, Human Rights, and the New International Order
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:41Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/329
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1328&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Speaking_Law_to_Power___Popula ...
Size:
1.267Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record