Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:40Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:40Z
dc.date.issued1925-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3286
dc.identifier.citationCharles E Clark, Union of Law and Equity, 25 COLUM. L. REV. 1 (1925).
dc.identifier.contextkey2333169
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2685
dc.description.abstract"The inherent and fundamental difference between actions at law and suits in equity cannot be ignored." So said the New York Court of Appeals nearly seventy-five years after the legislature had solemnly ordained that "The distinction between actions at law and suits in equity, and the forms of all such actions and suits heretofore existing, are abolished; and, there shall be in this state, hereafter, but one form of action, for the enforcement or protection of private rights and the redress or prevention of private wrongs, which shall be denominated a civil action."
dc.subjectThe Union of Law and Equity
dc.subject25 Columbia Law Review 1 (1925)
dc.titleThe Union of Law and Equity
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:40Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3286
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4281&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Union_of_Law_and_Equity.pdf
Size:
1.662Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record