Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:38Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:38Z
dc.date.issued1919-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3274
dc.identifier.contextkey2333188
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2672
dc.description.abstractIn Higgins Oil & Fuel Company v. Guaranty Oil Company, Ltd. (1919, La.) 82 So. 206, the defendant's duty to be neighborly was upheld and his privileges in using his land to dig for oil were correspondingly narrowed. The defendant had sunk an oil well on his land which caused air to get into the plaintiff's pump in a well on the latter's land, resulting in a great decrease in the productivity of the plaintiff's well. Although the defendant's well was a non-producer and could be closed without trouble or expense by simply putting back a plug, the defendant refused to close it. The court discusses both civil and common-law authorities and decides that the plaintiff is entitled to relief.
dc.subjectNeighborly Conduct Versus Property in Minerals
dc.subject29 Yale Law Journal 213 (1919)
dc.titleNeighborly Conduct Versus Property in Minerals
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:38Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3274
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4293&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Neighborly_Conduct_Versus_Prop ...
Size:
351.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record