Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:32.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:29Z
dc.date.issued1929-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3231
dc.identifier.contextkey2320125
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2625
dc.description.abstractfeature of the most modern practice systems. Under this procedure judgment may be entered summarily for the plaintiff in the more usual types of civil actions, on motion setting forth his demand and his belief that there is no defense to it, unless the defendant, by counter-affidavit, shows that the facts are in dispute. The reform is usually advocated because of its effectiveness in preventing delays by defendants, and in securing speedy justice for creditors. But its advantages would seem to be more than merely these. Because of its simplicity it is available for the prompt disposition of bona fide issues of law as well as of sham defenses. Except where a trial is necessary to settle an issue of fact, the whole judicial process is, by this procedure, made to function more quickly and with less complexity than in the ordinary long drawn out suit.
dc.subjectThe Summary Judgment (with Charles U. Samenow)
dc.subject38 Yale Law Journal 423 (1929)
dc.titleThe Summary Judgment
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:29Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3231
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4253&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Summary_Judgment.pdf
Size:
8.892Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record