Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBork, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:14Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:14Z
dc.date.issued1968-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3157
dc.identifier.citationRobert H Bork, Resale price maintenance and consumer welfare, 77 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL 950 (1968).
dc.identifier.contextkey2296502
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2542
dc.description.abstractThe basic issue in this exchange is whether Professors Gould and Yamey have materially weakened the case I made for the legality of resale price maintenance (r.p.m.) desired by a manufacturer who is not in collusion with other manufacturers. I believe they have not. In this response I will try to demonstrate that their Rejoinder's strictures on welfare economics are irrelevant, its price theory mistaken, and its demands for certainty one-sided and unreasonable.
dc.titleResale Price Maintenance and Consumer Welfare
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:14Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3157
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4157&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Resale_Price_Maintenance_and_C ...
Size:
1.693Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record